News & Emerging Research about Beans and Health

Emerging Research News   |   In the Media   |   What's New with the Glycemic Index?

Association of dietary patterns with cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer.

Meyerhardt JA, Niedzwieki D, Hollis D et al.–2007. Journal of the American Medical Association 298: 754-764

This observational research in approximately 1,000 adults from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, MA examined the relationship of dietary patterns with cancer recurrences and mortality of colon cancer survivors. For the purpose of this work, two major dietary patterns were identified: a prudent and a Western diet. The prudent dietary pattern was characterized by high intakes of fruits and vegetables, poultry, and fish, while the Western pattern was characterized by greater intakes of meat, fat, refined grains, and desserts. Results showed that greater intake of a Western dietary pattern after cancer diagnosis was associated with a significantly worse health outcome (i.e., colon cancer recurrences or death). The investigators concluded that “higher intake of a Western dietary pattern may be associated with a higher risk of recurrence and mortality among patients with stage III colon cancer.”

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

While a cause and effect cannot be established from this work due to the study design, an important association remains evident—following a typical Western-style dietary pattern can be harmful in individuals who have previously been diagnosed with colon cancer, not to mention the associations that may be present in presently healthy adults. What still is not evident from this work however, is which component of the diet is harmful? Is it one particular food and/or nutrient or a combination of foods/nutrients? A guess would be that we need studies to focus on the latter, since as individuals, we do not only eat one food, but rather a variety of foods.

Low-glycemic index or low-glycemic load diets for overweight and obesity.

Thomas DE, Elliott E, and Baur L.– 2007. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews 18(3): CD005105

While obesity prevalence is continually increasing, the scientific evidence remains uncertain as to the exact causality. It has been hypothesized that consuming low-glycemic index or low-glycemic load diets may produce greater weight loss in comparison to diets with a higher glycemic index or glycemic load. This systematic review examined the effects of low-glycemic index or low-glycemic load diet on weight loss in overweight or obese people. Studies that were considered in the systematic review included only randomized controlled trials comparing a low-glycemic index or low-glycemic load diet (LGI) with a higher glycemic index or high-glycemic load diet or any other diet (Cdiet) in overweight or obese people. Six studies were eligible for the analysis with a total of 202 participants. Subjects who consumed LGI diets had significantly lower body masses (-1.1 kg), decreased total fat mass and reduced body mass indexes relative to the Cdiet group. In addition, those on the LGI diet had a significantly greater reduction in total cholesterol in comparison to the Cdiets

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

These findings demonstrate that overweight or obese people following a low-glycemic index or low-glycemic load diet lost more weight and had more improvement in lipid profiles than those receiving other diets. Legumes, as a whole, have some of the lowest glycemic index values. Future marketing and communication strategies need to tap into this attribute as signs are apparent that consumers have an increased understanding of the glycemic index (Refer to “Whats New with the Glycemic Index?” on page 7).

Bean consumption is associated with greater nutrient intake, reduced systolic blood pressure, lower body weight, and a smaller waist circumference in adults: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002

Papanikolaou Y and Fulgoni VL.–2007. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, in press

Epidemiological studies have shown relationships between legume consumption and measures of cardiovascular disease and obesity. However, few observational trials have examined beans as a separate food variable when determining associations with health parameters. The researchers examined associations between consuming beans, and nutrient intakes and physiological parameters. Using data from NHANES 1999-2002, a secondary analysis was completed of a reliable 24-hour dietary recall where three groups of bean consumers were identified (N=1,475). The researchers determined mean nutrient intakes and physiological values between bean consumers and non-consumers. Relative to non-consumers, bean consumers had higher intakes of dietary fiber, potassium, magnesium, iron, and copper. Those consuming beans had a lower body weight and a smaller waist size relative to non-consumers. Additionally, consumers of beans had a 23 percent reduced risk of increased waist size and a 22 percent reduced risk of being obese. Baked bean consumption was associated with a lower systolic blood pressure.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Data from this observational study clearly show that bean consumers have better overall intake of several key nutrients, lower body weights and smaller waist circumferences, in addition to lower systolic blood pressure in comparison to non-consumers of beans. This evidence supports the benefits of bean consumption on nutrient intake, obesity prevention and on blood pressure. Since this is observational research, it needs to be followed up with a well-designed controlled clinical trial that examines the impact of long-term bean consumption on various health variables.